Reference
Challenge the specific record that appears wrong.
Name the company and field that appear wrong. Add the evidence or context a reviewer should inspect.
Example correction request
One example record
- Record
- Company report and original record ID
- Category
- Technology finding
- Submitted evidence
- Public page and observed value
- Review action
- Correct, clarify, or retain
Identify the record
Point to the exact company and field
A correction is easier to investigate when it refers to one concrete returned value.
- 1Company name and website
- 2
Original record ID or Kaiju report link
- 3Affected field and current value
- 4
Reason the result appears wrong or misleading
Provide supporting context
Show the evidence that should be considered
A correction may challenge the company match, the public observation, the field interpretation, or the current date.
- 1
Relevant public page, script, request, header, or other source
- 2
Date the conflicting evidence was observed
- 3
Known brand, subsidiary, redirect, or domain relationship
Record the outcome
Make the review decision visible
The correction path should show what changed and which returned files may be affected.
- 1Correct the value or company match
- 2
Clarify the field definition or limitation
- 3
Retain the result with documented supporting reasons
- 4
Identify downloaded files or reports that may need an update