Navigation

Explore Kaiju

Start with a customer, prospect, account, client, or research list, then inspect how Kaiju supports each finding.

Get StartedSee how Kaiju finds the data

Already using Kaiju?

Continue to your Team.

Sign in

Trust resource

Challenge the specific record that appears wrong.

A useful correction request identifies the affected company and field, includes the relevant supporting context, and records what changed after inspection.

Submit a correctionTrust centre
  • Record-level requests
  • Original company context preserved
  • Review outcome documented
  • Affected returned fields identified

Example correction request

A concrete record, not an abstract claim

Record
Company report and original record ID
Category
Technology finding
Submitted evidence
Public page and observed value
Review action
Correct, clarify, or retain
Published
Jul 20, 2026
Last reviewed
Jul 22, 2026
Reviewed by
Kaiju research team
Applies to
Current CSV company-research product

Identify the record

Point to the exact company and field

A correction is easier to investigate when it refers to one concrete returned value.

  1. 1Company name and website
  2. 2Original record ID or Kaiju report link
  3. 3Affected field and current value
  4. 4Reason the result appears wrong or misleading

Provide supporting context

Show the evidence that should be considered

A correction may challenge the company match, the public observation, the field interpretation, or the current date.

  1. 1Relevant public page, script, request, header, or other source
  2. 2Date the conflicting evidence was observed
  3. 3Known brand, subsidiary, redirect, or domain relationship

Record the outcome

Make the review decision visible

The correction path should show what changed and which returned files may be affected.

  1. 1Correct the value or company match
  2. 2Clarify the field definition or limitation
  3. 3Retain the result with documented supporting reasons
  4. 4Identify downloaded files or reports that may need an update

Continue the evaluation

Follow the next question behind the result.

Move from one trust concern to the methodology, product explanation, or limitation that helps your team decide whether the data is safe to use.

Methodology

Follow a returned field through the records behind it.

Open page

Evidence and confidence

Inspect the supporting observation.

Open page

Known limitations

Review the limits of the returned data.

Open page

Test the method

Report an incorrect record.

Include the company, affected field, original record or report ID, and the evidence that should be reviewed.

Submit a correctionTrust centre