Solution · Agencies and technology partners

Identify companies with technology conditions relevant to your services, minus the manual research.

Start with any list of clients, prospects, partner candidates, or companies. Kaiju checks public sources and returns what it observed, where it found it, and which checks were inconclusive. Your team reviews the results, filters them by the technologies or conditions that matter, and uses the evidence in further research, account selection, or client recommendations.

Analyze your company list See example findings

Original client and project context retained
Named technologies and categories returned
Sources, dates, and inconclusive checks included
Original columns preserved in the download

What your team receives

A reviewable company record

The original client or project context stays attached while Kaiju adds the technologies it observed, the supporting source, the observation date, and the result status.

Original context: client, project, territory, original ID
Observed technology: named platforms and categories
Supporting evidence: source, observation date, result status
Team review: investigate, exclude, or keep for review

Start: Provide the companies you want to investigate using company names, websites, or both.
Check: Kaiju checks public sources and records what it observed, where it found it, and which checks were inconclusive.
Review: Review the findings and supporting evidence, filter the results, and download them with your original company information intact.

Repeatable technology research

Apply consistent technology checks across client and prospect lists.

Check different groups of companies for the same technologies or public conditions while keeping each client’s or project’s original context attached to the results.

Check for relevant technologies

Look for named platforms and technology categories related to an implementation, integration, migration, or advisory service.

Investigate competing technologies

Find public evidence of competing or existing technologies, then review the sources before deciding whether a company warrants further research.

Preserve project context

Keep client, territory, campaign, and original IDs attached to every returned company.

Competitor and migration research

Keep the condition and evidence behind every result.

Define the technologies, categories, evidence, and exclusions that matter before Kaiju begins checking companies. Test the criteria against familiar examples, then keep the observed condition, supporting source, observation date, and review status attached to each result.

Define what Kaiju should check

Specify named products, technology categories, acceptable evidence, and exclusions. Keep observable technology use separate from assumptions about satisfaction or intent to change.

Test with familiar companies

Review companies where the technology is already known to be present or absent. Use those examples to assess the criteria and examine inconclusive checks.

Preserve why each result appeared

Keep the relevant condition, supporting evidence, observation date, review status, and original project identifier attached for review or handoff.

How it works

From a client research brief to reviewable company findings.

Use the same process for prospect research, partner assessments, implementation studies, or market analysis while keeping each client’s or project’s context attached.

01
Provide the companies and context
Start with company names, websites, or both. Include any client, project, territory, or original identifiers that should remain attached.
02
Resolve identities and check conditions
Kaiju resolves each company to the appropriate website, flags uncertain matches, and checks public sources for the technologies or conditions defined for the project.
03
Review and use the findings
Inspect the observations, supporting evidence, dates, and inconclusive checks, then filter or download the results with the original context preserved.

Agency and partner uses

Use reviewable technology evidence across prospecting, migration research, and client analysis.

Kaiju gives each company a clear research basis for further investigation or client discussion. The findings show observable technology conditions, but do not establish budget, dissatisfaction, buying intent, or readiness to change.

Implementation prospecting

Identify companies with technology environments relevant to your implementation or integration services, then review the evidence before prioritizing them.

Migration research

Find companies using named incumbent or competing technologies and assess whether the evidence warrants further migration research.

Client research and recommendations

Support client discussions with findings that preserve the observed condition, supporting source, observation date, and result status for each company.

Evidence before action

Check why a finding is supported before your team uses it.

Open any result to see what Kaiju found, where it found it, when it was observed, and whether the check was complete. Unclear and incomplete results remain visible instead of being silently converted into confident answers.

See how Kaiju produces a field

Company match
See which company and website Kaiju connected to the original row.
Returned finding
See the value Kaiju added and whether it is supported, unclear, incomplete, or unresolved.
Supporting source
Open the public page or observable signal behind an important finding.
Check status
See when the research happened and whether anything prevented Kaiju from completing it.

See how the same intelligence supports another team.

Each team starts with companies it already cares about. The file, terminology, and way the findings are used change with the team.

B2B technology vendors

Find companies with tech stacks relevant to your product and review the evidence behind each match.

See the solution

RevOps and GTM operations

Add evidence-backed company context to CRM records and company lists without replacing the fields your team already maintains.

See the solution

Browse solutions

Start with companies you already care about

Test the opportunity model using familiar client prospects.

Include known installations, known non-users, and unclear examples so your team can judge the supporting evidence and false-positive risk before using the results with clients.